Shark and Eureka have been two of the most globally popular vacuum brands these days.
Nevertheless, have you ever wondered which one is better so that it can fit your needs?
Of course, each vacuum brand has its own merits and downfalls.
To show you their good and wrong sides, I would like to compare two well-known products coming from the two trade names: Shark NV360 and Eureka.
WhirlWind Bagless Canister vacuum. As a result, you could have a deeper insight into which is suitable for you.
Shark NV360 Vs. Eureka WhirlWind Vacuum: Pros and Cons
1. Shark NV360
PROS
- High performance on high-pile carpets
- A large dust capacity
- Store easily
- Require frequent maintenance
PROS
- Easy to move around
- Needless times of maintenance
- Best used on low-pile carpets and bare floors
- Relatively bulky
1. Maintenance
Taking into account the maintenance factor, a Eureka WhirlWind Vacuum is higher rated than the Shark NV360. The Eureka preference has its roots in the more numbers of Shark parts that require continual maintenance.
For instance, while the Eureka model does not need the lint screen cleaning, its counterpart does the opposite. When you have access to the top lid of the dust cup, you can unlock it and see the lint screen. From time to time, if you do not maintain the part, a Shark vacuum likely to have problems.
Moreover, there is an additional brush roll to polish in the Shark model. The tool is more brutal to shampoo cause you can not remove it. Once you want to do it, take the head of the vacuum out of its body and turn it over. After a few times cleaning the floors, you might notice the brush roll is full of hair and stuck debris. Remove the dirt with your hands or a pair of scissors.
Other than that, in either Shark or Eureka vacuum, you need to maintain three crucial parts: dirt compartments, post-motor filters, and pre-motor filters. Ideally, it would help if you poured dirt out of the first part each time using. Clean the second and third parts with water alike.
2. Storage
Considering the storing ability, the Shark Navigator Lift-away Deluxe NV360 upright vacuum has such a higher score, around the seven to 7.5 mark. That might result from its reasonably small size, roughly 45.6 x 11.8 x 11.8 inches. More extensive than that is Eureka's dimensions, around 42 x 11 x 28 inches.
Besides, a Shark vacuum is well-equipped with extra onboard tool storage. That is to say; you can keep the upholstery and crevice tool in an accessory holder built-in.
3. Performance
Following the Shark navigator NV360 reviews, the machine works best on high-pile carpets. However, it often has difficulty in sucking up large debris on bare floors, and you have to pass it many times to polish low-pile carpets comprehensively.
On the other hand, the Eureka vacuum outperforms hardwood floors as well as carpets.
Final Words
In conclusion, above are the complete comparison between the two Shark and Eureka upright vacuums. Read more: https://www.besport.com/post/32178368 to get the information about these vacuums.
In a nutshell, the given Eureka has a better score than its counterpart in cleaning performance and maintenance.